Fomenko’s assertions are nothing short of revolutionary. He claims that the commonly accepted timeline of history is fundamentally flawed. According to Fomenko, the history of Ancient England was imported from the Byzantine Empire, and many significant historical events and figures are either misdated or entirely fictitious. He goes as far as to suggest that the Tartars and Mongols, traditionally seen as invaders of Russia, were actually the ancestors of modern Russians, living in a trilingual state with Arabic and Turkic spoken alongside Russian. This contradicts the accepted narrative of a brutal invasion and subsequent centuries of oppression.
Check: History: Fiction or Science? Chronology Vol.IV [Print Replica] Kindle Edition
by Anatoly Fomenko (Author), Gleb Nosovskiy (Author), Franck Tamdhu (Preface)
Furthermore, Fomenko argues that the Romanovs, who ascended to the Russian throne through conspiracy, enlisted German historians to create a historical narrative that legitimized their rule. He suggests that Ivan the Terrible, a central figure in Russian history, was actually a composite of four different rulers from rival dynasties. Such claims, if accepted, would fundamentally alter the understanding of Russian history.
The Mainstream Rejection
The response from mainstream historians has been overwhelmingly negative. Historians argue that Fomenko's theories lack credible evidence and rigorous methodology. They accuse him of cherry-picking data and disregarding established historical research and archaeological findings. For instance, the assertion that ancient civilizations like Rome, Greece, and Egypt are much younger than traditionally believed, with pivotal structures such as the pyramids of Giza being dated to the medieval period, contradicts extensive archaeological and textual evidence.
Moreover, historians from various nations have specific reasons to reject Fomenko's theories. English historians, for instance, take umbrage at the notion that their ancient history is a mere transplantation of Byzantine heritage. Such claims undermine the distinct cultural and historical identity that has been painstakingly constructed and studied over centuries. Similarly, Russian historians dismiss Fomenko's revisionist narrative as pseudoscience, arguing that it distorts the historical reality of events like the Mongol invasion.
A famous and high-quality book about Tartaria that cannot be missed: Tartaria - Secrets of Kabbalah
Solutions for Free Electricity and Water during a sinister agenda:
👉 Free Electricity and Water Solutions
Implications of Fomenko's Theories
If Fomenko’s theories were accepted, they would have far-reaching implications for the understanding of world history. He suggests that medieval European kings and princes were breakaway vice-regents from a global empire, needing a fabricated ancient past to legitimize their rule. This challenges the very foundation of European historical identity and the concept of national histories.
In addition, Fomenko's re-dating of ancient civilizations and his unconventional views on the history of religions would necessitate a complete overhaul of historical chronologies. He claims that the Old Testament was written after the New Testament, and that major religious shifts occurred much later than traditionally believed. Such assertions would not only disrupt the field of history but also have profound effects on the study of theology and religious history.